Task Performance
Every factor researchers have brought together to explain task performance, combined from 19 study models into one ranked driver set — the model the priority engine reasons over.
39 drivers · 19 contributing models · Handbook entry →
§1The drivers, by consensus
Ranked by how many independent models include each driver (consensus), then pooled effect. “In N of 19” is a robustness signal — a driver in many models is one many researchers agreed matters; a driver in one is a single lead worth following.
“Pooled r” is the meta-analytic prior where one exists; drivers marked study-reported have a model but not yet a pooled prior — a concrete acquisition target. This is the value-of-information view in miniature: the priority engine can rank which driver to measure first by consensus, strength, and how much is still unknown.
§2The models it’s built from
Each contributing study model — the researcher’s theory of this outcome — with its size and grade, so the meta-model is auditable back to its sources.
| Source study | Predictors | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| doi:10.1037/apl0000994 | 9 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0033-2909.124.2.262 | 5 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599 | 4 | A |
| doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x | 3 | A |
| doi:10.1007/s11031-016-9578-2 | 3 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 | 3 | A |
| doi:10.1177/0149206316632058 | 3 | A |
| doi:10.1177/0149206316665461 | 3 | B |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1037/a0018938 | 2 | B |
| doi:10.1037/a0013115 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1007/s10869-010-9201-6 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1111/joms.12402 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1037/a0013079 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1037/a0035661 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1111/j.2044-8325.1988.tb00467.x | 2 | B |
| doi:10.1080/1359432x.2023.2209320 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1177/014920630002600104 | 2 | A |