Handbook of Organization Measurement

Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)

construct.organizational_citizenship_behavior_ocb

The complete model → · Measurement plan →

§2The established instruments

What the field already uses — named and cited, not reproduced (item wording is copyrighted and withheld pending clearance).

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What drives organizational citizenship behavior (ocb)

PredictorrkNGradeConfidence
Spiritual Leadership+0.4717
Servant Leadership+0.37218,338A
Leader Member Exchange LMX+0.36420,493A
Trust In Organization+0.33318,760AI²≈0.97
Organizational Commitment+0.31231,633AI²≈0.99
Person Organization Fit+0.2722,172Acoherent
Job Satisfaction+0.27358,027AI²≈0.91
Procedural Justice+0.2526,790A
Positive Affect+0.202100Acoherent
Negative Affect−0.132100Acoherent

What organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) predicts

OutcomerkNGradeConfidence
Task Performance+0.51110,355Asingle study
Counterproductive Work Behaviours−0.32150Asingle study

§4As a model node

Where organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) sits when you drop it into a model — what feeds it, what it moves. Read left to right as a small, actionable causal claim.

Inputs (drivers)

  • Spiritual Leadership+0.47
  • Servant Leadership+0.37
  • Leader Member Exchange LMX+0.36
  • Trust In Organization+0.33
Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)

Outputs (outcomes)

  • Task Performance+0.51
  • Counterproductive Work Behaviours−0.32
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.