Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB)
Every factor researchers have brought together to explain organizational citizenship behavior (ocb), combined from 8 study models into one ranked driver set — the model the priority engine reasons over.
18 drivers · 8 contributing models · Handbook entry →
§1The drivers, by consensus
Ranked by how many independent models include each driver (consensus), then pooled effect. “In N of 8” is a robustness signal — a driver in many models is one many researchers agreed matters; a driver in one is a single lead worth following.
| Driver | Consensus | Pooled r | Grade | Heterogeneity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job Satisfaction | 2 / 8 | +0.27 | A | I²≈0.91 |
| Authentic Leadership | 1 / 8 | +0.33 | B | — |
| Organizational Commitment | 1 / 8 | +0.31 | A | I²≈0.99 |
| Ethical Leadership | 1 / 8 | +0.29 | B | — |
| Organizational Justice | 1 / 8 | +0.27 | A | — |
| Transformational Leadership | 1 / 8 | +0.27 | A | — |
| Trust In Leader | 1 / 8 | +0.27 | A | — |
| Person Organization Fit | 1 / 8 | +0.27 | A | — |
| Procedural Justice | 1 / 8 | +0.25 | A | — |
| Person Group Fit | 1 / 8 | +0.23 | A | — |
| Affective Commitment | 1 / 8 | +0.22 | A | — |
| Collectivism | 1 / 8 | +0.21 | A | — |
| Positive Affect | 1 / 8 | +0.20 | A | — |
| Agreeableness | 1 / 8 | +0.20 | B | — |
| Conscientiousness | 1 / 8 | +0.18 | B | — |
| Interactional Justice | 1 / 8 | +0.18 | B | — |
| Power Distance | 1 / 8 | +0.17 | B | — |
| Negative Affect | 1 / 8 | −0.13 | A | — |
“Pooled r” is the meta-analytic prior where one exists; drivers marked study-reported have a model but not yet a pooled prior — a concrete acquisition target. This is the value-of-information view in miniature: the priority engine can rank which driver to measure first by consensus, strength, and how much is still unknown.
§2The models it’s built from
Each contributing study model — the researcher’s theory of this outcome — with its size and grade, so the meta-model is auditable back to its sources.
| Source study | Predictors | Grade |
|---|---|---|
| doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01364 | 4 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425 | 3 | A |
| doi:10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.869 | 2 | B |
| doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1177/0149206316665461 | 2 | B |
| doi:10.1037/a0013115 | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x | 2 | A |
| doi:10.1037/a0018938 | 2 | A |