Handbook of Organization Measurement

Trust in leader

construct.trust_in_leader

The complete model → · Measurement plan →

How it’s measured operationally

Beyond survey measurement, this construct is also tracked as an operational metric from records:

Employee Trust Scoresurvey_rolluporganization
Survey measure of trust levels in teams, leaders, and the organization over time.
Mean of trust item scores · score

§2The established instruments

What the field already uses — named and cited, not reproduced (item wording is copyrighted and withheld pending clearance).

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What drives trust in leader

PredictorrkNGradeConfidence
Servant Leadership+0.7111,886Bsingle study
Transformational Leadership+0.6719,491Asingle study
Ethical Leadership+0.6614,105Bsingle study

What trust in leader predicts

OutcomerkNGradeConfidence
Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB+0.2713,002Asingle study

§4As a model node

Where trust in leader sits when you drop it into a model — what feeds it, what it moves. Read left to right as a small, actionable causal claim.

Inputs (drivers)

  • Servant Leadership+0.71
  • Transformational Leadership+0.67
  • Ethical Leadership+0.66
Trust in leader

Outputs (outcomes)

  • Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB+0.27
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.
Trust in leader — Handbook of Organization Measurement · Principia