Interactional justice
the perceived fairness of the interpersonal treatment one receives at work
§1The Principia rendering
A copyright-clean measure of this construct, authored by Principia and free to use — the one we can show in full.
Predicted psychometrics. These 10 items carry a design grade of A (avg design score 94/100) from the item-design model — an estimate pending calibration, not a measured reliability. Real responses (via deployment) sharpen it toward measured, which is what the licensing model collects.
How it’s measured operationally
Beyond survey measurement, this construct is also tracked as an operational metric from records:
Mean of interactional justice item scores · score§3The math on what we know
Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.
What interactional justice predicts
| Outcome | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trust In Organization | +0.51 | 1 | 2,169 | B | single study |
| Job Satisfaction | +0.43 | 1 | 1,872 | B | single study |
| Counterproductive Work Behaviours | −0.30 | 1 | 2,707 | A | single study |
| Organizational Commitment | +0.29 | 1 | 3,968 | B | single study |
| Turnover Intention | −0.24 | 1 | 1,692 | B | single study |
| Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB | +0.18 | 1 | 1,961 | B | single study |
| Task Performance | +0.13 | 1 | 1,036 | B | single study |