Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review

verifiedrich profile · Human Performance · 2015

Spitzmuller, Matthias; Sin, Hock-Peng; Howe, Michael; Fatimah, Shereen

10.1080/08959285.2015.1021041 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: statistical adjustmenttime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

proactive personalitytask performance

r = 0.33 · k=17 · grade A · unverified

proactive personalityjob satisfaction

r = 0.3 · k=18 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Using meta-analysis (283 effect sizes from 122 studies), we extend prior qualitative and quantitative reviews of research on proactive personality in a number of meaningful ways. First, we examine the discriminant and incremental validity of proactive personality using meta-analytic regression analyses. Our results reveal that more than 50% of variance in proactive personality is unrelated to the Big Five personality traits collectively. Also, proactive personality accounts for unique variance in overall job performance, task performance, and organizational citizenship behaviors, even after controlling for the Big Five personality traits and general mental ability (for overall job performance and task performance). Moreover, we find no subgroup differences in proactive personality, highlighting its potential use in selection contexts. In conclusion, we discuss implications of our findings for research and practice.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

10 supporting

supports…with several traits of the Big Five personality (i.e. extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness) (Gürbüz, Costigan, et al., 2022), it is a conceptually distinct construct and accounts for considerable additional variance in the prediction of task performance (Spitzmuller et al., 2015).

Fueling creativity: HR practices, work engagement, personality, and autonomy (2024) · CCBY

supportsTABLE 6 Summary of Meta-Analytic Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Regressing Individual-Targeted Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Proactive and Big Five Personality Traits True Score Validity Operational Validity Variable β SE B R2 R2 β SE B R2 R2 Step 1 .072∗ .062∗ Neuroticism −.09∗ .02 −.10∗ .02 Extraversion .07∗ .02 .07∗ .02 Openness to Experience .02 .02 .02 .02 Agreeableness .13∗ .02 .12∗ .02 Conscientiousness .12∗ .02 .11∗ .02 Step 2 .120∗ .048∗ .088∗ .026∗ Neuroticism −.07∗ .02 −.08∗ .02 Extraversion −.05∗ .02 .00 .02 Openness to Experience −.10∗ .02 −.03 .02 Agreeableness .21∗ .02 .15∗ .02 Conscientiousness −.01 .02 .05∗ .02 Proactive Personality .31∗ .02 .20∗ .02 ∗p .05.

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review (2015) · CCBYNCND

supports…these findings are aligned with previous research supporting the meaningful role of proactive personality for predicting job satisfaction (e.g., Spitzmuller et al., 2015), but also extend previous knowledge by specifically showing that the positive effect of this personality variable also…

Unwrapping the Influence of Proactive Personality on Job Satisfaction During Organizational Socialization: Examining the Intervening Effects of Newcomers’ Perceptions of Person–Environment Fit (2024) · CCBY

supportsD ow nl oa de d by [ Si ng ap or e M an ag em en t U ni ve rs ity ] at 1 8: 46 0 4 Ja nu ar y 20 18 366 SPITZMULLER, SIN, HOWE, FATIMAH TABLE 7 Summary of Meta-Analytic Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Regressing Organization-Targeted Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Proactive and Big Five Personality Traits True Score Validity Operational Validity Variable β SE B R2 R2 β SE B R2 R2 Step 1 .050∗ .043∗ Neuroticism −.08∗ .02 −.09∗ .02 Extraversion .03 .02 .03 .02 Openness to Experience −.00 .02 −.00 .02 Agreeableness .03 .02 .03 .02 Conscientiousness .17∗ .02 .16∗ .02 Step 2 .075∗ .025∗ .059∗ .016∗ Neuroticism −.07∗ .02 −.08∗ .02 Extraversion −.06∗ .02 −.02 .02 Openness to Experience −.09∗ .02 −.04∗ .02 Agreeableness .08∗ .02 .05∗ .02 Conscientiousness .07∗ .02 .11∗ .02 Proactive personality .22∗ .02 .15∗ .02 ∗p .05.

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review (2015) · CCBYNCND

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review · Principia