Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature

verifiedrich profile · Journal of Vocational Behavior · 2009

Fuller, Bryan; Marler, Laura E.

10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 · CrossRef: verified

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

proactive personalitytask performance

r = 0.23 · k=8 · grade A · unverified

proactive personalitytask performance

r = 0.23 · grade A · unverified

proactive personalityorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.41 · k=8 · grade B · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

3 supporting

supportsTABLE 6 Summary of Meta-Analytic Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Regressing Individual-Targeted Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Proactive and Big Five Personality Traits True Score Validity Operational Validity Variable β SE B R2 R2 β SE B R2 R2 Step 1 .072∗ .062∗ Neuroticism −.09∗ .02 −.10∗ .02 Extraversion .07∗ .02 .07∗ .02 Openness to Experience .02 .02 .02 .02 Agreeableness .13∗ .02 .12∗ .02 Conscientiousness .12∗ .02 .11∗ .02 Step 2 .120∗ .048∗ .088∗ .026∗ Neuroticism −.07∗ .02 −.08∗ .02 Extraversion −.05∗ .02 .00 .02 Openness to Experience −.10∗ .02 −.03 .02 Agreeableness .21∗ .02 .15∗ .02 Conscientiousness −.01 .02 .05∗ .02 Proactive Personality .31∗ .02 .20∗ .02 ∗p .05.

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review (2015) · CCBYNCND

supportsD ow nl oa de d by [ Si ng ap or e M an ag em en t U ni ve rs ity ] at 1 8: 46 0 4 Ja nu ar y 20 18 366 SPITZMULLER, SIN, HOWE, FATIMAH TABLE 7 Summary of Meta-Analytic Hierarchical Regression Analysis: Regressing Organization-Targeted Organizational Citizenship Behavior on Proactive and Big Five Personality Traits True Score Validity Operational Validity Variable β SE B R2 R2 β SE B R2 R2 Step 1 .050∗ .043∗ Neuroticism −.08∗ .02 −.09∗ .02 Extraversion .03 .02 .03 .02 Openness to Experience −.00 .02 −.00 .02 Agreeableness .03 .02 .03 .02 Conscientiousness .17∗ .02 .16∗ .02 Step 2 .075∗ .025∗ .059∗ .016∗ Neuroticism −.07∗ .02 −.08∗ .02 Extraversion −.06∗ .02 −.02 .02 Openness to Experience −.09∗ .02 −.04∗ .02 Agreeableness .08∗ .02 .05∗ .02 Conscientiousness .07∗ .02 .11∗ .02 Proactive personality .22∗ .02 .15∗ .02 ∗p .05.

Investigating the Uniqueness and Usefulness of Proactive Personality in Organizational Research: A Meta-Analytic Review (2015) · CCBYNCND

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.