The complete model

Counterproductive Work Behaviours

Every factor researchers have brought together to explain counterproductive work behaviours, combined from 6 study models into one ranked driver set — the model the priority engine reasons over.

13 drivers · 6 contributing models · Handbook entry →

§1The drivers, by consensus

Ranked by how many independent models include each driver (consensus), then pooled effect. “In N of 6” is a robustness signal — a driver in many models is one many researchers agreed matters; a driver in one is a single lead worth following.

DriverConsensusPooled rGradeHeterogeneity
Conscientiousness3 / 6−0.36A
Agreeableness3 / 6−0.29AI²≈0.96
Organizational Justice2 / 6−0.27A
Ethical Leadership1 / 6−0.40AI²≈0.94
Job Satisfaction1 / 6−0.36B
Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB1 / 6−0.32A
Helping Behavior1 / 6−0.32B
Interactional Justice1 / 6−0.30A
Emotional Stability1 / 6−0.27B
Authentic Leadership1 / 6−0.25B
Neuroticism1 / 6+0.19A
Openness1 / 6−0.08A
Extraversion1 / 6−0.05A

“Pooled r” is the meta-analytic prior where one exists; drivers marked study-reported have a model but not yet a pooled prior — a concrete acquisition target. This is the value-of-information view in miniature: the priority engine can rank which driver to measure first by consensus, strength, and how much is still unknown.

§2The models it’s built from

Each contributing study model — the researcher’s theory of this outcome — with its size and grade, so the meta-model is auditable back to its sources.

Source studyPredictorsGrade
doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2019.04.0045A
doi:10.24837/pru.v8i1.4274A
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.4103B
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.4252A
doi:10.1177/01492063166654612B
doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.12412A
Composed live from the registry. The complete model is the union of all study-level models of this outcome; study-level models are derived from the effect corpus and re-derived every loop cycle.
The complete model of Counterproductive Work Behaviours · Principia