Handbook of Organization Measurement

Counterproductive Work Behaviours

construct.counterproductive_work_behaviours

The complete model → · Measurement plan →

§1How it’s measured

This is a behavioral construct — an event recorded in HR systems, not a self-report. It is measured as an operational metric with a formula, not a questionnaire; a Likert scale here would be a category error.

Shrinkage Ratebehavioralunit
Inventory loss attributable to employee theft/error (CWB proxy).
shrinkage value / sales · rate

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What drives counterproductive work behaviours

PredictorrkNGradeConfidence
Integrity−0.41267,066A
Ethical Leadership−0.40212,696AI²≈0.94
Conscientiousness−0.36317,652A
Agreeableness−0.29314,534AI²≈0.96
Organizational Justice−0.2727,769Acoherent
Moral Disengagement+0.45150Asingle study
Abusive Supervision+0.4111,715Asingle study
Job Satisfaction−0.361693Bsingle study
Trust In Organization−0.3312,088Asingle study
Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB−0.32150Asingle study
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.