Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of its attitudinal, health, and behavioural consequences.
verifiedmedium profile · Canadian Psychology / Psychologie canadienne · 2013
Bedi, Akanksha; Schat, Aaron C. H.
How this was studied
A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
organizational politics → organizational commitment
organizational politics → emotional exhaustion
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
organizational politics predicts emotional exhaustion
organizational politics predicts organizational commitment
organizational politics predicts turnover intention
In the authors’ words
The article’s own abstract.
In this study, we report the results of a meta-analysis of the relations between perceptions of organisational politics (POP) and attitudinal, psychological health, and behavioural variables using data from 118 independent samples, totaling 44,560 participants. Among the variables examined, POP was most strongly related to organisational trust and interactional justice, but also exhibited relations with a variety of other criteria, including positive relations with stress, burnout, turnover intentions and counterproductive work behaviour, and negative relations with job satisfaction, citizenship behaviour, and job performance. We also found evidence that some effect sizes were moderated by the publication status, geographical origin of data, and types of measures used to assess POP.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
No open-access quotations have been captured yet.
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.