Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature.

verifiedrich profile · Journal of Applied Psychology · 2007

Humphrey, Stephen E.; Nahrgang, Jennifer D.; Morgeson, Frederick P.

10.1037/0021-9010.92.5.1332 · CrossRef: verified · attribution required

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

autonomyorganizational commitment

r = 0.37 · k=15 · grade A · unverified

job resourcesorganizational commitment

r = 0.77 · k=12 · grade A · unverified

performance feedbackorganizational commitment

r = 0.33 · k=8 · grade A · unverified

autonomyturnover intention

r = -0.01 · k=21 · grade B · unverified

autonomyemotional exhaustion

r = -0.3 · k=14 · grade A · unverified

performance feedbacktask performance

r = 0.2 · k=26 · grade A · unverified

autonomytask performance

r = 0.23 · k=42 · grade A · unverified

autonomyjob satisfaction

r = 0.48 · k=175 · grade A · unverified

task varietyjob satisfaction

r = 0.46 · grade B · unverified

performance feedbackjob satisfaction

r = 0.43 · k=126 · grade A · unverified

performance feedbackemotional exhaustion

r = -0.1 · k=3 · grade C · unverified

job resourcesjob satisfaction

r = 0.56 · k=52 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

The authors developed and meta-analytically examined hypotheses designed to test and extend work design theory by integrating motivational, social, and work context characteristics. Results from a summary of 259 studies and 219,625 participants showed that 14 work characteristics explained, on average, 43% of the variance in the 19 worker attitudes and behaviors examined. For example, motivational characteristics explained 25% of the variance in subjective performance, 2% in turnover perceptions, 34% in job satisfaction, 24% in organizational commitment, and 26% in role perception outcomes. Beyond motivational characteristics, social characteristics explained incremental variances of 9% of the variance in subjective performance, 24% in turnover intentions, 17% in job satisfaction, 40% in organizational commitment, and 18% in role perception outcomes. Finally, beyond both motivational and social characteristics, work context characteristics explained incremental variances of 4% in job satisfaction and 16% in stress. The results of this study suggest numerous opportunities for the continued development of work design theory and practice.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

32 supporting3 disputing

supportsMeta-analytic evidence also speaks to coworker influence, as Humphrey, Nahrgang, and Morgeson (2007) found that social characteristics at work (e.g., feedback and social support) explain incremental variance in organizational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance, and…

Referral Hire Presence Implications for Referrer Turnover and Job Performance (2019) · CCBYNC

supportsMeta-analytic evidence also speaks to coworker influence, as Humphrey, Nahrgang, and Morgeson (2007) found that social characteristics at work (e.g., feedback and social support) explain incremental variance in organizational commitment, job satisfaction, turnover intentions, and performance, and…

Referral Hire Presence Implications for Referrer Turnover and Job Performance (2019) · CCBYNC

supports…and has been shown to have positive effects on several behavioral, attitudinal and well-being outcomes, such as performance (Dysvik & Kuvaas, 2011; Humphrey et al., 2007), innovative work behavior (De Spiegelaere et al., 2014), organizational commitment (Spector, 1986), internal work motivation…

The Ambivalence of Job Autonomy and the Role of Job Design Demands (2020) · CCBY

supports…enhanced performance in project and production management, accelerated development of skills and continuous improvement, improved conflict management (Humphrey et al. 2007, Yang and Guy 2011), enhanced short- and long-term proactivity and creativity (Grant and Ashford 2008), increased agility in…

Improving construction management with decentralised production planning and control: exploring the production crew and manager perspectives through a multi-method approach (2022) · CCBYNCND

supports…and has been shown to have positive effects on several behavioral, attitudinal and well-being outcomes, such as performance (Dysvik & Kuvaas, 2011; Humphrey et al., 2007), innovative work behavior (De Spiegelaere et al., 2014), organizational commitment (Spector, 1986), internal work motivation…

The Ambivalence of Job Autonomy and the Role of Job Design Demands (2020) · CCBY

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.