A Meta-Analysis Linking Organizational Learning Culture, Performance, Innovation, and Job Attitudes

verifiedrich profile · Academy of Management Proceedings · 2022

Grohnert, Therese; Ennemoser, Nele; Orth, Magdalena; Gijselaers, Wim

10.5465/ambpp.2022.12044abstract · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

organizational learningjob satisfaction

r = 0.49 · grade B · unverified

organizational learningturnover intention

r = -0.28 · grade B · unverified

organizational learningorganizational commitment

r = 0.47 · grade B · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Both management scholars and practitioners agree that organizations need to continuously learn as a response to ongoing changes in the business environment, and that an organizational learning culture (OLC) is critical in this endeavor. Yet, creating an OLC is a time- and resource-intensive endeavor, whose return on investment is not certain; evidence on the OLC-performance link is scattered across a range of academic domains, industries, cultural contexts, and measurements. Building on the resource-based view of the firm and the competing values framework, this study synthesizes extant evidence on the link between OLC and organizational performance, innovation, and performance-related work attitudes. Meta-analyses of 86 studies and 223 effect sizes with a cumulative N = 43,232 reveal that OLC is positively related to all outcomes, explaining 12% of variance in organizational performance, 20% of innovation, 24% of job satisfaction, 22% of organizational commitment, and 8% of turnover intentions, statistically significant effect sizes that are characterized by high levels of heterogeneity. These findings provide coherent evidence on the value of investing in an OLC, resulting in managerial and research implications.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

0 supporting3 mentioninglegacy verdicts

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.