Enhancing and Extending the Meta-Analytic Comparison of Newer Genre Leadership Forms

verifiedrich profile · Frontiers in Psychology · 2022

Fuller, Bryan; Bajaba, Abdulah; Bajaba, Saleh

10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872568 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.8

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

ethical leadershipoverall job performance

r = 0.31 · k=29 · grade A · unverified

servant leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.52 · k=38 · grade A · unverified

authentic leadershiporganizational commitment

r = 0.52 · k=32 · grade A · unverified

servant leadershiporganizational commitment

r = 0.62 · k=30 · grade A · unverified

servant leadershipturnover intention

r = -0.34 · k=8 · grade A · unverified

authentic leadershipwork engagement

r = 0.42 · k=37 · grade A · unverified

ethical leadershiporganizational commitment

r = 0.45 · k=56 · grade A · unverified

ethical leadershipoverall job performance

r = 0.31 · k=29 · grade A · unverified

servant leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.52 · k=38 · grade A · unverified

authentic leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.5 · k=37 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipturnover intention

r = -0.38 · k=19 · grade A · unverified

servant leadershiporganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.35 · k=20 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Interest in leadership research is growing, however, the rate of leadership learning is slowing down due to the proliferation of new leadership constructs. The objective of the present meta-analysis is to address the significant shortcomings in prior meta-analytic research on newer genre leadership forms by (a) utilizing a substantially greater number of studies and observations than in previous meta-analyses and (b) examining the meta-analytic correlations among the newer genre leadership forms. The results of the present study indicate that the newer genre leadership forms overlap to a greater degree than previously reported, while at the same time accounting for some degree of unique variance in the literature's most studied outcome variables; estimates of the relative contribution of each leadership form to the outcomes are provided, providing new insights into the distinctiveness of each leadership form. The findings suggest that pursuing an integrated theory and measure of newer genre leadership forms is a desirable future step for leadership research.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

3 supportinglegacy verdicts

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.