Transformational Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Meta-Analytic Test of Underlying Mechanisms

verifiedrich profile · Frontiers in Psychology · 2017

Nohe, Christoph; Hertel, Guido

10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01364 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

transformational leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.48 · k=84 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipaffective commitment

r = 0.44 · k=100 · grade A · unverified

job satisfactionorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.24 · k=69 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershiporganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.27 · k=48 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershiporganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.27 · k=48 · grade A · unverified

trust in leaderorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.27 · k=12 · grade A · unverified

affective commitmentorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.22 · k=64 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipleader member exchange lmx

r = 0.75 · k=26 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Based on social exchange theory, we examined and contrasted attitudinal mediators (affective organizational commitment, job satisfaction) and relational mediators (trust in leader, leader-member exchange; LMX) of the positive relationship between transformational leadership and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Hypotheses were tested using meta-analytic path models with correlations from published meta-analyses (761 samples with 227,419 individuals overall). When testing single-mediator models, results supported our expectations that each of the mediators explained the relationship between transformational leadership and OCB. When testing a multi-mediator model, LMX was the strongest mediator. When testing a model with a latent attitudinal mechanism and a latent relational mechanism, the relational mechanism was the stronger mediator of the relationship between transformational leadership and OCB. Our findings help to better understand the underlying mechanisms of the relationship between transformational leadership and OCB.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

10 supporting

supportsPrior studies have indicated that affective commitment can mediate the relationship between leadership and organizational citizenship behavior.(15,16) The effect can also be investigated when it mediates the relationship between leader-member interaction (ie, LMX) and a special form of citizenship behavior (ie, helping behavior).

Exchange Relationships and Helping Behavior: An Empirical Analysis of Data from CGSS2015 (2022) · CCBYNC

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.