Does Work Engagement Effectively Predict Subjective Well-Being? : A Meta-Analysis Using R Statistical Software
verifiedthin profile · Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences · 2023
Ding, Hui; Si, Shoujing
How this was studied
A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
In the authors’ words
The article’s own abstract.
Abstract Does work engagement effectively predict subjective well-being? In this paper, we investigated the relationship between work engagement and subjective well-being by synthesizing 176 effects from 59 studies involving 21927 subjects. The results showed that work engagement were positively correlated with subjective well-being, while job burnout were negatively correlated with subjective well-being. Literature sources significantly adjusted the relationship among work engagement, job burnout and subjective well-being. The paper proved that work engagement and subjective well-being are closely related, and literature sources may play a moderating role.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
No open-access quotations have been captured yet.
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.