Transformational Leadership and Behavioral Innovation in Education: A Meta-Analysis

verifiedthin profile · Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Bisnis (JPEB) · 2024

Suryadi; Sawan, Fransiskus; Anugrahsari, Santi

10.21009/jpeb.012.1.3 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

transformational leadershipinnovative work behavior

r = 0.338 · grade C · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Educational changes present significant challenges and opportunities for organizations to grow and develop in response to evolving demands. These changes become opportunities when accompanied by appropriate behaviors at both individual and organizational levels. This study aims to examine the impact of transformational leadership on innovative behavior based on previous studies. A meta-analysis method was employed to analyze research data using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (CMA) software. The findings indicate that 89% of studies meeting the inclusion criteria reported a significant effect size. The placement of square boxes in the forest plot, which do not align in a straight line, suggests variation in the results among these studies. Furthermore, the average effect size of 0.338 represents the overall influence of transformational leadership on the innovative behavior of teachers or lecturers. The heterogeneity test of effect size confirms that the estimation model applied follows a random-effects model. The highest average effects were observed in five categories: international teachers (ES = 0.55), junior high school teachers (ES = 0.39), senior high school teachers (ES = 0.32), lecturers (ES = 0.30), and elementary school teachers (ES = 0.16).).

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

0 supporting

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.

Transformational Leadership and Behavioral Innovation in Education: A Meta-Analysis · Principia