PREDICTORS OF OBJECTIVE AND SUBJECTIVE CAREER SUCCESS: A META‐ANALYSIS

verifiedrich profile · Personnel Psychology · 2005

NG, THOMAS W. H.; EBY, LILLIAN T.; SORENSEN, KELLY L.; FELDMAN, DANIEL C.

10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00515.x · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.8

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

proactive personalityinternal mobility

r = 0.16 · k=2 · grade B · unverified

internal mobilitycareer satisfaction

r = 0.22 · k=12 · grade A · unverified

career developmentjob satisfaction

r = 0.3 · grade B · unverified

career developmentinternal mobility

r = 0.23 · k=6 · grade A · unverified

career sponsorshipinternal mobility

r = 0.12 · k=10 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Using the contest‐ and sponsored‐mobility perspectives as theoretical guides, this meta‐analysis reviewed 4 categories of predictors of objective and subjective career success: human capital, organizational sponsorship, sociodemographic status, and stable individual differences. Salary level and promotion served as dependent measures of objective career success, and subjective career success was represented by career satisfaction. Results demonstrated that both objective and subjective career success were related to a wide range of predictors. As a group, human capital and sociodemographic predictors generally displayed stronger relationships with objective career success, and organizational sponsorship and stable individual differences were generally more strongly related to subjective career success. Gender and time (date of the study) moderated several of the relationships examined.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

4 supporting

supportsMoreover, the findings support the prior research outcomes of the positive relationship between organizational support for career development and career satisfaction (Allen, Eby, Poteet, Lentz, & Lima, 2004; Barnett & Bradley, 2007; Guan et al., 2015; Guan et al., 2014; Lent & Brown, 2006; Ng et al., 2005; Orpen, 1994; Pazy, 1988; Price & Reichert, 2017) and the

Sustainability in Career Development: The Impact of Career Development Culture and Career Support of Senior Management on Career Satisfaction (2021) · CCBY

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.