A META‐ANALYTIC REVIEW OF ATTITUDINAL AND DISPOSITIONAL PREDICTORS OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR

verifiedrich profile · Personnel Psychology · 1995

ORGAN, DENNIS W.; RYAN, KATHERINE

10.1111/j.1744-6570.1995.tb01781.x · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

helping behaviorjob satisfaction

r = 0.24 · grade C · unverified

organizational commitmentorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.23 · k=16 · grade B · unverified

job satisfactionorganizational citizenship behavior ocb

r = 0.28 · k=28 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

A quantitative review of 55 studies supports the conclusion that job attitudes are robust predictors of organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). The relationship between job satisfaction and OCB is stronger than that between satisfaction and in‐role performance, at least among nonmanagerial and nonprofessional groups. Other attitudinal measures (perceived fairness, organizational commitment, leader supportiveness) correlate with OCB at roughly the same level as satisfaction. Dispositional measures do not correlate nearly as well with OCB (with the exception of conscientiousness). The most notable moderator of these correlations appears to be the use of self‐ versus other‐rating of OCB; self‐ratings are associated with higher correlations, suggesting spurious inflation due to common method variance, and much greater variance in correlation. Differences in subject groups and work settings do not account for much variance in the relationships. Implications are noted for theory, practice, and strategies for future research on OCB.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

3 supporting1 disputing

supports…with job satisfaction and organizational commitment (Bateman & Organ, 1983; Fahr et al, 1990; Iaffaldano & Muchinsky, 1985; Lui & Cohen, 2010; Organ & Ryan, 1995; Podsakoff et al, 2000; Puffer, 1987) and provide as explanation for these findings that employees with altruistic behavior create…

GREEK NURSE’S PROFESSIONAL VALUE OF ALTRUISM AND JOB SATISFACTION. (2016) · CCBY

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.