Organizational justice perceptions and turnover intention: a meta-analytic review

verifiedrich profile · Kybernetes · 2022

Özkan, Ahmet Hakan

10.1108/k-01-2022-0119 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

procedural justiceturnover intention

r = -0.369 · grade A · unverified

distributive justiceturnover intention

r = -0.396 · grade B · unverified

distributive justiceturnover intention

r = -0.396 · grade A · unverified

informational justiceturnover intention

r = -0.358 · grade A · unverified

organizational justiceturnover intention

r = -0.436 · grade B · unverified

interpersonal justiceturnover intention

r = -0.361 · grade A · unverified

organizational justiceturnover intention

r = -0.436 · grade A · unverified

organizational justiceturnover intention

r = -0.436 · k=83 · grade B · unverified

procedural justiceturnover intention

r = -0.369 · grade B · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Purpose The aim of the study was to survey the relationships between organizational justice perceptions and turnover intention by using meta-analysis and to determine the possible moderators affecting these relationships. Design/methodology/approach In total, 83 correlation values were used. Comprehensive meta-analysis software (CMA) was used to analyze the collected studies. Heterogeneity and publication bias of each data set were tested. Findings Each data were heterogeneous and included no publication bias. The results suggested that the effect size of distributive justice on turnover intention is −0.396, interactional justice on turnover intention is −0.341, interpersonal justice on turnover intention is −0.361, informational justice on turnover intention is −0.358, procedural justice on turnover intention is −0.369 and overall organizational justice on turnover intention is −0.436. Region was a moderator for the relationship between distributive justice and turnover intention. Originality/value The results of the study can provide guidance to the future researchers. Moreover, the managers can use these results for the implementation of organizational strategies and policies.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

0 supporting4 mentioninglegacy verdicts

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.