Bridging two tales of engagement: a meta-analytic review of employee engagement and customer engagement in service contexts

verifiedmedium profile · Journal of Service Management · 2022

Michel, Eric J.; Lindsey-Hall, Kristina K.; Kepes, Sven; Qi, Ji (Miracle); Leon, Matthew R.; Weinzimmer, Laurence G.; Wheeler, Anthony R.

10.1108/josm-06-2019-0171 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis, effect size · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

employee service performancecustomer loyalty

r = 0.47 · k=42 · grade B · unverified

employee engagement scoreemployee service performance

r = 0.45 · k=102 · grade A · unverified

work engagementemployee service performance

r = 0.45 · k=102 · grade B · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Purpose Employing a service-profit chain (S-PC) framework, this manuscript investigates the relationship between employee engagement (EE) and customer engagement (CE) within service contexts and explores how a mediating mechanism, service employee work performance (SEWP), links EE with CE. Design/methodology/approach Meta-analytic procedures ascertain the magnitude of the relationship between EE and SEWP ( k = 102, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>ρ</m:mi><m:mo>^</m:mo></m:mover></m:mrow></m:math> = 0.45) and between SEWP and three dimensions of CE: customer purchases ( k = 42, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>ρ</m:mi><m:mo>^</m:mo></m:mover></m:mrow></m:math> = 0.47), customer knowledge ( k = 4, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>ρ</m:mi><m:mo>^</m:mo></m:mover></m:mrow></m:math> = 0.33) and customer influence ( k = 7, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><m:mrow><m:mover accent="true"><m:mi>ρ</m:mi><m:mo>^</m:mo></m:mover></m:mrow></m:math> = 0.42). The current meta-analysis reports an effect size for the EE-overall SEWP relationship nearly 1.50 times greater than related extant meta-analyses. Findings Results suggest SEWP, consisting of service employee task performance and contextual performance, serves as an important intervening mechanism between EE and CE by considering nine dimensions of SEWP. Such findings suggest that to maximize SEWP, service employees must go beyond simply being satisfied in their work roles; instead, service employees must feel energized, find fulfillment and meaning and be engrossed in their work to maximize the service they provide to customers. Originality/value This research extends previous meta-analytic efforts, bridges the multi-disciplinary gap between EE and CE research, provides an empirical link allowing for informed decision-making for managers and stakeholders, underscores the importance of service employees surpassing required job responsibilities to meet and exceed customer needs and suggests an agenda for future service research integrating EE and CE.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

0 supporting

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.