A meta‐analysis of the relationship between sales orientation‐customer orientation (SOCO) and salesperson job performance

verifiedmedium profile · Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing · 2007

Jaramillo, Fernando; Ladik, Daniel M.; Marshall, Greg W.; Mulki, Jay Prakash

10.1108/08858620710773431 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal threatened · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

customer orientation cotask performance

r = 0.16 · k=16 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Purpose In the years since Saxe and Weitz developed a scale to measure the selling orientation and customer orientation (SOCO) of a salesperson, research findings on the effect of SOCO on salesperson job performance have shown mixed results. This article aims to synthesize the findings from the empirical studies to identify the direction and the strength of this relationship. In addition, it aims to investigate the moderating effect of customer type (business or end user consumer) and type of job performance measure used (subjective or objective). Design/methodology/approach Research questions were addressed by a meta‐analysis of 16 studies containing 17 effect sizes from 3,477 respondents. Findings Meta‐analysis results reveal an attenuated weighted mean effect size ( r ) of this relationship of 0.14, with a 90 percent confidence interval of 0.04 to 0.23. The disattenuated mean effect size ( rc ) is 0.16. Findings also reveal that neither customer type nor type of job performance measures moderated the SOCO and job performance relationship. Research limitations/implications Although diligence was exercised to reduce selection bias, relevant studies may have been excluded from this meta‐analysis. Practical implications Study findings demonstrate that SOCO is an important predictor of salesperson job performance. High performance occurs when salespeople focus their energy on identifying the customer's individual needs and offer products to satisfy those needs. Originality/value This is the first published SOCO meta‐analysis.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

4 supporting

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.