Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis.

verifiedrich profile · Journal of Applied Psychology · 2009

Podsakoff, Nathan P.; Whiting, Steven W.; Podsakoff, Philip M.; Blume, Brian D.

10.1037/a0013079 · CrossRef: crossref_mismatch

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: longitudinal trenddata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

helping behaviortask performance

r = 0.47 · k=24 · grade A · unverified

helping behaviorturnover intention

r = -0.11 · k=40 · grade A · unverified

organizational citizenship behavior ocbtask performance

r = 0.51 · k=38 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Although one of the main reasons for the interest in organizational citizenship behaviors (OCBs) is the potential consequences of these behaviors, no study has been reported that summarizes the research regarding the relationships between OCBs and their outcomes. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to provide a meta-analytic examination of the relationships between OCBs and a variety of individual- and organizational-level outcomes. Results, based on 168 independent samples (N = 51,235 individuals), indicated that OCBs are related to a number of individual-level outcomes, including managerial ratings of employee performance, reward allocation decisions, and a variety of withdrawal-related criteria (e.g., employee turnover intentions, actual turnover, and absenteeism). In addition, OCBs were found to be related (k = 38; N = 3,611 units) to a number of organizational-level outcomes (e.g., productivity, efficiency, reduced costs, customer satisfaction, and unit-level turnover). Of interest, somewhat stronger relationships were observed between OCBs and unit-level performance measures in longitudinal studies than in cross-sectional studies, providing some evidence that OCBs are causally related to these criteria. The implications of these findings for both researchers and practitioners are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

8 supporting

supports…such as voluntarily teaching, training, or otherwise intellectually benefitting co-workers, this provides another pathway for arguing that it enhances job performance, because organizational citizenship behavior is known to relate positively to team-level job performance (Podsakoff et al. 2009).

The Values of Intellectual Transparency (2023) · CCBYNCND

supports…such as voluntarily teaching, training, or otherwise intellectually benefitting co-workers, this provides another pathway for arguing that it enhances job performance, because organizational citizenship behavior is known to relate positively to team-level job performance (Podsakoff et al. 2009).

The Values of Intellectual Transparency (2023) · CCBYNCND

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.