Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity.

verifiedrich profile · Journal of Applied Psychology · 2004

Judge, Timothy A.; Piccolo, Ronald F.

10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755 · CrossRef: verified · attribution required

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal addressed · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.9

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

follower satisfaction with leadertransformational leadership

r = 0.71 · k=23 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.58 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipleader effectiveness

r = 0.64 · k=27 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.58 · k=18 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershiptask performance

r = 0.27 · k=13 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipgroup performance

r = 0.26 · k=41 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipoverall job performance

r = 0.27 · k=13 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipjob satisfaction

r = 0.58 · k=18 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipemployee motivation

r = 0.53 · k=16 · grade A · unverified

transformational leadershipfollower satisfaction with leader

r = 0.71 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

This study provided a comprehensive examination of the full range of transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership. Results (based on 626 correlations from 87 sources) revealed an overall validity of .44 for transformational leadership, and this validity generalized over longitudinal and multisource designs. Contingent reward (.39) and laissez-faire (-.37) leadership had the next highest overall relations; management by exception (active and passive) was inconsistently related to the criteria. Surprisingly, there were several criteria for which contingent reward leadership had stronger relations than did transformational leadership. Furthermore, transformational leadership was strongly correlated with contingent reward (.80) and laissez-faire (-.65) leadership. Transformational and contingent reward leadership generally predicted criteria controlling for the other leadership dimensions, although transformational leadership failed to predict leader job performance.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

31 supporting1 disputing

supports…meta-analytic evidence show that transformational leadership was positively related to leader effectiveness (ρ = .79, Hoch et al. 2018; ^ p = .64, Judge and Piccolo 2004), and one meta-analysis showed that transformational leadership behaviours accounted for 8.4% of the variance in leader…

Transformational leadership effectiveness: an evidence-based primer (2022) · CCBYNCND

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.