Meta-analysis of assessment center validity.
verifiedrich profile · Journal of Applied Psychology · 1987
Gaugler, Barbara B.; Rosenthal, Douglas B.; Thornton, George C.; Bentson, Cynthia
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
assessment centers → quality of hire
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
supports “Prior criterion-related validity research has shown that assessment centers are good predictors of job performance and potential, at the level of both the overall assessment rating and the Wnal dimension rating (Arthur et al. 2003; Gaugler et al. 1987; Hermelin, Lievens, and Robertson 2007).”
supports “The meta-analysis by Gaugler, Rosenthal, Thornton, and Bentson (1987) of early AC studies showed that overall assessment ratings were good predictors of several criteria such as job performance, potential, training performance, and career advancement (e.g., salary).”
supports “Gaugler et al. (1987) stated that the presence of professional psychologists as assessors could be seen as a quality regulation to assessment centre validity.”
Ancillary research
Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199234738.003.0010
- 10.1080/08959280903248310
- 10.4102/sajip.v29i2.97
- 10.33844/ijol.2022.60620
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.