A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments.

verifiedmedium profile · Journal of Applied Psychology · 1985

Premack, Steven L.; Wanous, John P.

10.1037/0021-9010.70.4.706 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

realistic job previewvoluntary turnover

r = -0.06 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

Les auteurs exposent une metaanalyse quantitative de 21 experiences de «realistic job preview» (RJP), dont ils ont etudie les effets selon huit criteres (le climat, l'engagement, les conduites de coping, les expectations initiales, la satisfaction professionnelle, la performance professionnelle, l'autoselection et la survivance de l'emploi)

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

1 supporting

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.

A meta-analysis of realistic job preview experiments. · Principia