The role of affectivity in job satisfaction: a meta-analysis
verifiedrich profile · Personality and Individual Differences · 2000
Connolly, James J.; Viswesvaran, Chockalingam
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
supports “…associate both high PA and low NA with mental and physical health (Lyubomirsky et al. 2005; Pressman and Cohen 2005), overall job satisfaction (e.g., Connolly and Viswesvaran 2000; Judge and Larsen 2001; Judge et al. 2017), positive workplace experiences, and work behavior (Ng and Sorensen 2009).”
supports “Another meta-analysis on the role of affectivity and job satisfaction showed that positive affect can predict 10–25% of variance in job satisfaction (Connolly and Viswesvaran, 2000).”
supports “Recent meta-analyses demonstrate that positive affect significantly correlates with job satisfaction, underscoring its central role in workplace well-being (Connolly & Viswesvaran, 2000; Donaldson et al., 2019).”
Ancillary research
Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.