Who thinks they're a big fish in a small pond and why does it matter? A meta-analysis of perceived overqualification

verifiedrich profile · Journal of Vocational Behavior · 2017

Harari, Michael B.; Manapragada, Archana; Viswesvaran, Chockalingam

10.1016/j.jvb.2017.06.002 · CrossRef: verified

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

perceived overqualificationcounterproductive work behaviours

r = 0.16 · grade A · unverified

perceived overqualificationturnover intention

r = 0.37 · grade A · unverified

perceived overqualificationjob satisfaction

r = -0.41 · grade A · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

8 supporting1 disputing

supportsAlbeit we focused on positive key performance and well-being indicators, earlier research has demonstrated that counterproductive work behaviors (CWB) constitute a prevalent outcome of perceived overqualification (Harari et al., 2017), and that anger constitutes one of the main mechanisms through which CWB is elicited (Liu et al.

Reacting to Perceived Overqualification: Uniting Strain-Based and Self-Regulatory Adjustment Reactions and the Moderating Role of Formal Work Arrangements (2023) · CCBY

Ancillary research

Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.