Exploring the relationship between HRM and firm performance: A meta-analysis of longitudinal studies
verifiedrich profile · Human Resource Management Review · 2017
Saridakis, George; Lai, Yanqing; Cooper, Cary L.
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
hr practices → firm performance
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
supports “In strategic HRM, complementary HR practices can significantly boost organizational performance (Saridakis et al., 2017).”
supports “HRM practices, such as performance management, and talent management, have a positive effect on company performance (Delaney & Huselid, 1996; Heilmann et al., 2018; Saridakis et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2006).”
supports “This has also been confirmed across longitudinal studies, additionally showing that a system of HRM practices has a stronger impact on organizational performance than do HRM practices individually (Saridakis et al., 2017).”
supports “SMEs increasingly engage in HRM practices to increase company performance (Delaney & Huselid, 1996; Heilmann et al., 2018; Saridakis et al., 2016; Zheng et al., 2006).”
supports “This has also been confirmed across longitudinal studies, additionally showing that a system of HRM practices has a stronger impact on organizational performance than do HRM practices individually (Saridakis et al., 2017).”
disputes “Nevertheless, a lack of consensus exists regarding which HRM practices, or combinations of practices, are most strongly associated with organizational performance (Saridakis et al., 2017).”
Ancillary research
Neighbouring works in the citation graph around this article.
- 10.1177/21582440241242206
- 10.1080/00472778.2024.2326576
- 10.1177/00187267251392079
- 10.1080/09585192.2024.2408026
- 10.1177/15344843241301668
- 10.1080/09585192.2025.2483745
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.