A meta‐analysis on predictors of turnover intention of hospital nurses in South Korea (2000–2020)

verifiedrich profile · Nursing Open · 2021

Kim, Hyeoneui; Kim, Eun Gyung

10.1002/nop2.872 · CrossRef: verified

How this was studied

paradigm: positivistpurpose: explanatory causaldesign: meta analytic synthesisidentification: nonetime: cross sectionaldata: quantitative survey

A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.

analysis: meta analysis · validity (validity): internal unclear · external addressed · construct addressed · statistical addressed · classifier confidence 0.85

What this article reports

The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.

job embeddednessturnover intention

r = -0.483 · k=22 · grade B · unverified

work engagementturnover intention

r = -0.503 · k=18 · grade B · unverified

career developmentturnover intention

r = -0.386 · k=8 · grade C · unverified

Models this article informs

The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.

In the authors’ words

The article’s own abstract.

AIMS: To identify the predictors of Registered Nurses' turnover intention and analyse the effect sizes. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of previous research, conducted to comprehensively identify the predictors of turnover intention. METHODS: In total, 417 studies from 1 January 2000 to 30 April 2020 that investigated predictors of turnover intention of South Korean nurses were reviewed. The data were analysed using the R statistical package. Network graphs were used to analyse the relationships among turnover predictors, and meta-analysis was performed to determine the effect sizes of the correlations. RESULTS: This review analysed common predictors identified in previous studies. Burnout (0.541), emotional exhaustion (0.511), job stress (0.390) and career plateau (0.386) showed positive effect sizes, while organizational commitment (-0.540), person-organizational fit (-0.521), career commitment (-0.508), work engagement (-0.503), job satisfaction (-0.491) and job embeddedness (-0.483) showed negative effect sizes.

What the literature says about it

Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.

3 supportinglegacy verdicts

No open-access quotations have been captured yet.

Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.