A Meta‐Analytic Review of the Within‐Person Relationship Between Affect and Job Performance
verifiedthin profile · Journal of Organizational Behavior · 2025
Aitken, John A.; Baines, Julia I.; Wonders, Madeline E.; Kaplan, Seth A.; Clark, Jonathan E.
How this was studied
A meta-analytic synthesis — it pools many primary studies rather than running a single design, so there is no single-study diagram.
What this article reports
The findings we extracted from this work, normalized into Principia’s relationship form (X → Y). Each feeds the synthesized models below.
Models this article informs
The meta-analytic priors this article contributes evidence to — its place in the broader synthesis.
In the authors’ words
The article’s own abstract.
ABSTRACT In recent years, there has been a shift from a between‐person, static view of trait affect and stable performance to a within‐person, dynamic view of state affect and episodic performance. However, these dynamic relationships have yet to be summarized. In this preregistered meta‐analysis, we tested Affect Events Theory—a within‐person theoretical framework that discusses how affect relates to job performance—across 123 independent samples, 14 717 individuals, and 127 410 observations to summarize the within‐person associations between affect and job performance over the workday (i.e., a time frame of 24 h or less). Results showed that within‐person positive affect (PA) was associated with higher task performance, higher organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), and lower counterproductive work behavior (CWB); negative affect (NA) was inversely related to these forms of performance. However, there was a lack of homology across within‐ and between‐person levels of analysis: Between‐person effects were consistently larger; indeed, PA and NA's within‐person effect sizes were generally small to moderate, and PA and NA accounted for less than 5% of the variance in each dimension of job performance. Furthermore, temporal moderator analyses demonstrated that affect was consistently associated with task performance over time, whereas associations of affect and discretionary performance were less straightforward. We discuss how these findings extend prior theorizing, focusing on the need to integrate within‐ and between‐person perspectives, the differences in relationships among job performance dimensions, and temporal considerations for these relationships. We conclude by discussing promising directions for future research.
What the literature says about it
Attributed, open-access quotes from other works that cite this article, plus the citation-graph verdict tally. Corroborations and disputes, in one place — the honest-broker view.
No open-access quotations have been captured yet.
Assembled from Principia’s registry — bibliographic record, extracted effect sizes, the models they inform, and open-access citing literature.