Handbook of Organization Measurement
Organizational Performance
construct.organizational_performance
§3The math on what we know
Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.
What drives organizational performance
| Predictor | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entrepreneurial Orientation | +0.29 | 2 | 149,209 | A | I²≈0.94 |
| High Performance Work Systems | +0.28 | 2 | 35,817 | A | coherent |
| Training | +0.15 | 2 | 75,083 | A | — |
| Collective Turnover | −0.09 | 2 | 145,009 | A | I²≈1.00 |
| Absorptive Capacity | +0.40 | 1 | 50 | B | single study |
| Collective Job Satisfaction | +0.34 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| High Involvement Work Practices Hiwps | +0.20 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| High Performance Work Practices | +0.20 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Voluntary Turnover | −0.15 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Collective Pay For Performance | +0.11 | 1 | 50 | B | single study |