Handbook of Organization Measurement

Organizational Attractiveness

construct.organizational_attractiveness

The complete model → · Measurement plan →

How it’s measured operationally

Beyond survey measurement, this construct is also tracked as an operational metric from records:

Candidate Experience Scoresurvey_rolluporganization
Score derived from candidate surveys capturing satisfaction or likelihood to recommend the hiring process.
Aggregated candidate survey responses, typically scaled 1-10 or 1-5 · score

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What drives organizational attractiveness

PredictorrkNGradeConfidence
Applicant Reactions+0.49115,033Asingle study
Procedural Fairness+0.49115,033Asingle study
Pay Level Competitiveness+0.27150Bsingle study
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.
Organizational Attractiveness — Handbook of Organization Measurement · Principia