Registry · Priors

construct.burnout predicts construct.task_performance

normal · weakly_informative · 1 studies · N = 8,561

Distribution

Storage scale (Fisher z)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Storage scale (Fisher z). 95% CI ≈ [-0.187, -0.136]; mean ≈ -0.161.-0.213-0.187-0.161-0.136-0.110z0density

mean ≈ -0.161 · 95% CI ≈ [-0.187, -0.136]

Reader scale (r)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Reader scale (r). 95% CI ≈ [-0.185, -0.135]; mean ≈ -0.160.-0.210-0.185-0.160-0.135-0.110r0density

mean ≈ -0.160 · 95% CI ≈ [-0.185, -0.135]

Weakly informative prior. This prior is weakly informative. It will nudge your posterior but won't overwhelm it; expect data to do most of the work in modest samples.

Intervals

Confidence interval (95%) — uncertainty about the mean ρ
[-0.18, -0.14]
Credibility interval (95%) — distribution of the true effect across settings (the Bayesian prior)
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate (k = 1)
I² (heterogeneity) — share of total variance from between-study differences
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate

k<2 — between-study heterogeneity not estimable; credibility interval / generalization not assessed

Evidence provenance

published ρ=-0.16 (k=1, replication: single); no primary-deployment evidence yet

Sourceρ (r)Scope
Published literature-0.16k = 1 · N = 8,561

No primary-deployment evidence yet — this prior rests on published literature alone. As anonymized, aggregated effect sizes from real deployments are contributed, they appear here as a distinct, publication-bias-free source, fused with the literature into a posterior estimate.

Code

Drop this prior straight into your model. Snippets generated from the synthesized distribution + parameters.

target += normal_lpdf(beta | -0.161387, 0.0129201);
beta = pm.Normal("beta", mu=-0.161387, sigma=0.0129201)
brms::prior(normal(-0.161387, 0.0129201), class = "b")
# base R sample
rnorm(N, mean = -0.161387, sd = 0.0129201)
np.random.normal(loc=-0.161387, scale=0.0129201, size=N)

Parameters

FamilyParameters
normalmu = -0.1614, sigma = 0.01292, r_mean = -0.1600, k_studies = 1.000, tau_squared = 0.000

Synthesis

Method
single_study
Informativeness
weakly_informative
Replication status
single
k_studies
1
n_total
8,561
Last updated
2026-07-16T01:09:30.943Z

Quality distribution

GradeCount
A0
B1
C0
D0

Source articles

The research this prior is synthesized from — each is a full dossier (findings, the models it informs, and what the literature says).

Contributing effect sizes

Effect-size detail pages land with a later sub-ticket; for now, ids link to the filtered list. Browse all rows via /registry/effects.