Handbook of Organization Measurement
Work/Family Enrichment
construct.work_family_enrichment
§3The math on what we know
Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.
What drives work/family enrichment
| Predictor | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior | +0.42 | 1 | 2,950 | A | single study |
| Work Engagement | +0.42 | 1 | 10,452 | A | single study |
What work/family enrichment predicts
| Outcome | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Job Satisfaction | +0.43 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Organizational Commitment | +0.34 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Task Performance | +0.28 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
§4As a model node
Where work/family enrichment sits when you drop it into a model — what feeds it, what it moves. Read left to right as a small, actionable causal claim.
Inputs (drivers)
- Family Supportive Supervisor Behavior+0.42
- Work Engagement+0.42
→
Work/Family Enrichment
→
Outputs (outcomes)
- Job Satisfaction+0.43
- Organizational Commitment+0.34
- Task Performance+0.28