Handbook of Organization Measurement
Safety participation
construct.safety_participation
§3The math on what we know
Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.
What drives safety participation
| Predictor | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Climate | +0.80 | 1 | 58,118 | B | single study |
What safety participation predicts
| Outcome | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Accidents | −0.15 | 1 | 2,004 | A | single study |
§4As a model node
Where safety participation sits when you drop it into a model — what feeds it, what it moves. Read left to right as a small, actionable causal claim.
Inputs (drivers)
- Safety Climate+0.80
→
Safety participation
→
Outputs (outcomes)
- Accidents−0.15