Handbook of Organization Measurement

Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)

construct.leader_member_exchange_lmx

The complete model → · Measurement plan →

§2The established instruments

What the field already uses — named and cited, not reproduced (item wording is copyrighted and withheld pending clearance).

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What drives leader-member exchange (lmx)

PredictorrkNGradeConfidence
Transformational Leadership+0.7519,246Asingle study
Ethical Leadership+0.7114,052Bsingle study
Servant Leadership+0.651938Bsingle study

What leader-member exchange (lmx) predicts

OutcomerkNGradeConfidence
Job Satisfaction+0.54222,131A
Organizational Commitment+0.49223,431Acoherent
Turnover Intention−0.40113,583Bsingle study
Innovative Work Behavior+0.39178,370Asingle study
Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB+0.36420,493A
Creativity+0.34111,671Asingle study
Task Performance+0.322100Acoherent
Work Engagement+0.3112,466Bsingle study
Counterproductive Work Behaviours−0.24150Bsingle study

§4As a model node

Where leader-member exchange (lmx) sits when you drop it into a model — what feeds it, what it moves. Read left to right as a small, actionable causal claim.

Inputs (drivers)

  • Transformational Leadership+0.75
  • Ethical Leadership+0.71
  • Servant Leadership+0.65
Leader-Member Exchange (LMX)

Outputs (outcomes)

  • Job Satisfaction+0.54
  • Organizational Commitment+0.49
  • Turnover Intention−0.40
  • Innovative Work Behavior+0.39
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.