Handbook of Organization Measurement

Informational justice

construct.informational_justice

Adequacy, candor, timeliness, and tailoring of the explanations and communications an authority figure provides about the procedures used and outcomes reached. Split by Colquitt (2001) out of the broader 'interactional justice' construct originated by Bies & Moag (1986); the second of the two facets the interactional-justice construct decomposes into under the field's current four-facet model (distributive, procedural, interpersonal, informational).

§3The math on what we know

Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.

What informational justice predicts

OutcomerkNGradeConfidence
Turnover Intention−0.36150Asingle study
Composed live from the Principia registry. Effect sizes are synthesized priors (random-effects meta-analysis); grades are the top study-quality grade in each pool; I² is pooled heterogeneity. Source-instrument item wording is withheld pending copyright clearance (PRN-207); the Principia rendering is owned and shown in full.