Handbook of Organization Measurement
Abusive Supervision
construct.abusive_supervision
§2The established instruments
What the field already uses — named and cited, not reproduced (item wording is copyrighted and withheld pending clearance).
- Abusive Supervision Scale — Tepper
§3The math on what we know
Synthesized priors from the live registry: pooled r, studies (k), total N, top study grade, and heterogeneity. Rows flagged for heterogeneity or single-study evidence are directional, not settled — read them as a central tendency.
What abusive supervision predicts
| Outcome | r | k | N | Grade | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Knowledge Hiding | +0.45 | 1 | 2,384 | A | single study |
| Counterproductive Work Behaviours | +0.41 | 1 | 1,715 | A | single study |
| Emotional Exhaustion | +0.36 | 1 | 4,343 | A | single study |
| Job Satisfaction | −0.34 | 1 | 6,560 | A | single study |
| Organizational Commitment | −0.30 | 1 | 2,423 | A | single study |
| Organizational Citizenship Behavior OCB | −0.24 | 1 | 2,842 | A | single study |
| Work Stress | +0.24 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Work Engagement | −0.23 | 1 | 50 | A | single study |
| Task Performance | −0.19 | 1 | 4,012 | A | single study |