construct.work_engagement predicts construct.task_performance
normal · informative · 4 studies · N = 79,719
Distribution
Intervals
- Confidence interval (95%) — uncertainty about the mean ρ
- [0.43, 0.50]
- Credibility interval (95%) — distribution of the true effect across settings (the Bayesian prior)
- [0.40, 0.52]
- I² (heterogeneity) — share of total variance from between-study differences
- 90% — considerable heterogeneity; moderators likely dominate
The true effect is ~constant across settings — it generalizes.
SD_ρ≈0 — true effect is ~constant across settings; generalizes (observed-score scale until artifact correction, PRN-058)
Evidence provenance
published ρ=0.46 (k=4, high heterogeneity (I²=0.90)); no primary-deployment evidence yet
| Source | ρ (r) | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| Published literature | 0.46 | k = 4 · N = 79,719 |
- high heterogeneity (I²=0.90)
- replication: meta-analytic
No primary-deployment evidence yet — this prior rests on published literature alone. As anonymized, aggregated effect sizes from real deployments are contributed, they appear here as a distinct, publication-bias-free source, fused with the literature into a posterior estimate.
Code
Drop this prior straight into your model. Snippets generated from the synthesized distribution + parameters.
target += normal_lpdf(beta | 0.501595, 0.0232364);beta = pm.Normal("beta", mu=0.501595, sigma=0.0232364)brms::prior(normal(0.501595, 0.0232364), class = "b")# base R sample
rnorm(N, mean = 0.501595, sd = 0.0232364)np.random.normal(loc=0.501595, scale=0.0232364, size=N)Parameters
| Family | Parameters |
|---|---|
| normal | I2 = 0.8993, mu = 0.5016, sigma = 0.02324, r_mean = 0.4634, k_studies = 4.000, tau_squared = 0.001538, fisher_z_bias = -0.01536, r_mean_bare_bones = 0.4787 |
Synthesis
- Method
- random_effects_meta
- Informativeness
- informative
- Replication status
- meta-analytic
- k_studies
- 4
- n_total
- 79,719
- Last updated
- 2026-07-16T01:10:09.249Z
Quality distribution
| Grade | Count |
|---|---|
| A | 4 |
| B | 0 |
| C | 0 |
| D | 0 |
Source articles
The research this prior is synthesized from — each is a full dossier (findings, the models it informs, and what the literature says).
Work Engagement: A meta-Analysis Using the Job Demands-Resources Model
WORK ENGAGEMENT: A QUANTITATIVE REVIEW AND TEST OF ITS RELATIONS WITH TASK AND CONTEXTUAL PERFORMANCE
Contributing effect sizes
Effect-size detail pages land with a later sub-ticket; for now, ids link to the filtered list. Browse all rows via /registry/effects.