Registry · Priors

construct.resilience correlates construct.personal_accomplishment

normal · weakly_informative · 1 studies · N = 5,885

Distribution

Storage scale (Fisher z)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Storage scale (Fisher z). 95% CI ≈ [0.00445, 0.0556]; mean ≈ 0.0300.-0.02210.003930.03000.05610.0822z0density

mean ≈ 0.0300 · 95% CI ≈ [0.00445, 0.0556]

Reader scale (r)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Reader scale (r). 95% CI ≈ [0.00447, 0.0555]; mean ≈ 0.0300.-0.02210.003950.03000.05610.0821r0density

mean ≈ 0.0300 · 95% CI ≈ [0.00447, 0.0555]

Weakly informative prior. This prior is weakly informative. It will nudge your posterior but won't overwhelm it; expect data to do most of the work in modest samples.

Intervals

Confidence interval (95%) — uncertainty about the mean ρ
[0.00, 0.06]
Credibility interval (95%) — distribution of the true effect across settings (the Bayesian prior)
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate (k = 1)
I² (heterogeneity) — share of total variance from between-study differences
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate

k<2 — between-study heterogeneity not estimable; credibility interval / generalization not assessed

Evidence provenance

published ρ=0.03 (k=1, replication: single); no primary-deployment evidence yet

Sourceρ (r)Scope
Published literature0.03k = 1 · N = 5,885

No primary-deployment evidence yet — this prior rests on published literature alone. As anonymized, aggregated effect sizes from real deployments are contributed, they appear here as a distinct, publication-bias-free source, fused with the literature into a posterior estimate.

Code

Drop this prior straight into your model. Snippets generated from the synthesized distribution + parameters.

target += normal_lpdf(beta | 0.030009, 0.0130388);
beta = pm.Normal("beta", mu=0.030009, sigma=0.0130388)
brms::prior(normal(0.030009, 0.0130388), class = "b")
# base R sample
rnorm(N, mean = 0.030009, sd = 0.0130388)
np.random.normal(loc=0.030009, scale=0.0130388, size=N)

Parameters

FamilyParameters
normalmu = 0.03001, sigma = 0.01304, r_mean = 0.03000, k_studies = 1.000, tau_squared = 0.000

Synthesis

Method
single_study
Informativeness
weakly_informative
Replication status
single
k_studies
1
n_total
5,885
Last updated
2026-07-16T01:10:04.214Z

Quality distribution

GradeCount
A1
B0
C0
D0

Source articles

The research this prior is synthesized from — each is a full dossier (findings, the models it informs, and what the literature says).

Contributing effect sizes

Effect-size detail pages land with a later sub-ticket; for now, ids link to the filtered list. Browse all rows via /registry/effects.