Registry · Priors

construct.perceived_organizational_support predicts construct.task_performance

normal · weakly_informative · 1 studies · N = 24,480

Distribution

Storage scale (Fisher z)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Storage scale (Fisher z). 95% CI ≈ [0.180, 0.205]; mean ≈ 0.192.0.1670.1800.1920.2050.218z0density

mean ≈ 0.192 · 95% CI ≈ [0.180, 0.205]

Reader scale (r)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Reader scale (r). 95% CI ≈ [0.178, 0.202]; mean ≈ 0.190.0.1650.1780.1900.2020.215r0density

mean ≈ 0.190 · 95% CI ≈ [0.178, 0.202]

Weakly informative prior. This prior is weakly informative. It will nudge your posterior but won't overwhelm it; expect data to do most of the work in modest samples.

Intervals

Confidence interval (95%) — uncertainty about the mean ρ
[0.18, 0.20]
Credibility interval (95%) — distribution of the true effect across settings (the Bayesian prior)
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate (k = 1)
I² (heterogeneity) — share of total variance from between-study differences
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate

k<2 — between-study heterogeneity not estimable; credibility interval / generalization not assessed

Evidence provenance

published ρ=0.19 (k=1, replication: meta-analytic); no primary-deployment evidence yet

Sourceρ (r)Scope
Published literature0.19k = 1 · N = 24,480

No primary-deployment evidence yet — this prior rests on published literature alone. As anonymized, aggregated effect sizes from real deployments are contributed, they appear here as a distinct, publication-bias-free source, fused with the literature into a posterior estimate.

Code

Drop this prior straight into your model. Snippets generated from the synthesized distribution + parameters.

target += normal_lpdf(beta | 0.192337, 0.00639177);
beta = pm.Normal("beta", mu=0.192337, sigma=0.00639177)
brms::prior(normal(0.192337, 0.00639177), class = "b")
# base R sample
rnorm(N, mean = 0.192337, sd = 0.00639177)
np.random.normal(loc=0.192337, scale=0.00639177, size=N)

Parameters

FamilyParameters
normalmu = 0.1923, sigma = 0.006392, r_mean = 0.1900, k_studies = 1.000, tau_squared = 0.000

Synthesis

Method
single_study
Informativeness
weakly_informative
Replication status
meta-analytic
k_studies
1
n_total
24,480
Last updated
2026-05-29T15:21:18.790Z

Quality distribution

GradeCount
A1
B0
C0
D0

Contributing effect sizes

Effect-size detail pages land with a later sub-ticket; for now, ids link to the filtered list. Browse all rows via /registry/effects.