Registry · Priors

construct.ethical_leadership predicts construct.job_satisfaction

normal · weakly_informative · 1 studies · N = 4,578

Distribution

Storage scale (Fisher z)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Storage scale (Fisher z). 95% CI ≈ [0.515, 0.584]; mean ≈ 0.549.0.4790.5140.5490.5850.620z0density

mean ≈ 0.549 · 95% CI ≈ [0.515, 0.584]

Reader scale (r)
Prior PDF · normalnormal distribution. Reader scale (r). 95% CI ≈ [0.474, 0.526]; mean ≈ 0.500.0.4470.4730.5000.5270.553r0density

mean ≈ 0.500 · 95% CI ≈ [0.474, 0.526]

Weakly informative prior. This prior is weakly informative. It will nudge your posterior but won't overwhelm it; expect data to do most of the work in modest samples.

Intervals

Confidence interval (95%) — uncertainty about the mean ρ
[0.47, 0.53]
Credibility interval (95%) — distribution of the true effect across settings (the Bayesian prior)
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate (k = 1)
I² (heterogeneity) — share of total variance from between-study differences
— needs ≥2 studies to estimate

k<2 — between-study heterogeneity not estimable; credibility interval / generalization not assessed

Evidence provenance

published ρ=0.50 (k=1, replication: meta-analytic); no primary-deployment evidence yet

Sourceρ (r)Scope
Published literature0.50k = 1 · N = 4,578

No primary-deployment evidence yet — this prior rests on published literature alone. As anonymized, aggregated effect sizes from real deployments are contributed, they appear here as a distinct, publication-bias-free source, fused with the literature into a posterior estimate.

Code

Drop this prior straight into your model. Snippets generated from the synthesized distribution + parameters.

target += normal_lpdf(beta | 0.549306, 0.0176708);
beta = pm.Normal("beta", mu=0.549306, sigma=0.0176708)
brms::prior(normal(0.549306, 0.0176708), class = "b")
# base R sample
rnorm(N, mean = 0.549306, sd = 0.0176708)
np.random.normal(loc=0.549306, scale=0.0176708, size=N)

Parameters

FamilyParameters
normalmu = 0.5493, sigma = 0.01767, r_mean = 0.5000, k_studies = 1.000, tau_squared = 0.000

Synthesis

Method
single_study
Informativeness
weakly_informative
Replication status
meta-analytic
k_studies
1
n_total
4,578
Last updated
2026-05-30T16:21:26.555Z

Quality distribution

GradeCount
A0
B1
C0
D0

Contributing effect sizes

Effect-size detail pages land with a later sub-ticket; for now, ids link to the filtered list. Browse all rows via /registry/effects.